Jump to content

Tibble v. Edison International

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tibble v. Edison International
Argued February 24, 2015
Decided May 18, 2015
Full case nameGlenn Tibble, et al, Petitioners v. Edison International, et al.
Docket no.13–550
Citations575 U.S. 523 (more)
135 S. Ct. 1823; 191 L. Ed. 2d 795
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
MajorityBreyer, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Employee Retirement Income Security Act

Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. 523 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty."[1]

Opinion of the Court

[edit]

Associate Justice Stephen Breyer authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.[2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Tibble v. Edison International".
  2. ^ "Tibble et al. v. Edison International et al" (PDF). United States Supreme Court. May 18, 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 8, 2022.
[edit]